Driver Inc: What’s Being Done, Why It Matters, and What You Can Do

As discussed in the last two posts in this series the Driver Inc. model is a hot-button topic in Canada’s trucking industry. It blurs the lines between employment and independent contracting, often at the expense of employees’ rights, government tax revenues, and fair competition. While this practice continues to generate debate, these questions remain: What is the Canadian government doing to address the issue? How are industry associations and stakeholders responding? And most importantly, how can shippers and brokers identify and avoid Driver Inc. companies?

What Is the Canadian Government Doing About Driver Inc.?

The Canadian government has been slow to act decisively against Driver Inc., but there are signs of movement. The primary agencies involved in addressing the issue include:

  1. Canada Revenue Agency (CRA): The CRA has been increasingly vocal about cracking down on companies abusing the Driver Inc. model. These businesses often misclassify employees as independent contractors to sidestep payroll taxes, Employment Insurance (EI) premiums, and Canada Pension Plan (CPP) contributions. The CRA has launched audits and levied fines against offending companies, although enforcement has been inconsistent at best.

  2. Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC): The ESDC has made efforts to educate employers and employees about the risks and legal implications of the Driver Inc. model. Through campaigns and resources, they aim to raise awareness about worker misclassification and its long-term consequences for individuals and the broader economy.

  3. Legislative Proposals: While no federal legislation explicitly targets Driver Inc., calls for legal reforms are getting louder. Proposed measures include clearer definitions of independent contractors versus employees and stiffer penalties for misclassification. However, as of now, these proposals remain firmly in the discussion phase. Making many industry folks question whether the government really cares enough to take meaningful action.

What Are Industry Associations and Stakeholders Doing?

Several trucking associations and industry stakeholders have stepped up to tackle the Driver Inc. issue head-on. Here’s how they’re contributing:

  1. Canadian Trucking Alliance (CTA): The CTA has been at the forefront of advocating against the Driver Inc. model. They’ve launched educational campaigns aimed at shippers and carriers, highlighting the legal risks and ethical concerns associated with this practice. The CTA also works closely with government agencies to push for stricter enforcement and regulatory clarity.

  2. Provincial Trucking Associations: Provincial bodies like the Ontario Trucking Association (OTA) and others have echoed the CTA’s stance. These organizations provide resources to help businesses comply with labor laws and avoid inadvertently engaging with Driver Inc. companies.

  3. Labor Unions: Labor unions, such as Unifor, have also raised alarms about Driver Inc., emphasizing its detrimental impact on workers’ rights. They’ve called for stronger enforcement and urged workers to report companies engaging in misclassification. One of their board members said “Driver Inc is wage theft”.

  4. Shipper Advocacy: Some shippers are taking proactive steps by vetting carriers and ensuring they align with legal and ethical practices. These efforts not only protect their businesses from liability but also uphold industry standards.

Why Shippers Should Avoid Driver Inc. Companies

  1. Reputational Damage: Partnering with unethical or non-compliant carriers can tarnish a shipper’s reputation. In today’s transparent business environment, stakeholders increasingly value ethical practices.

  2. Supply Chain Disruptions: Companies operating under the Driver Inc. model may face shutdowns, fines, or loss of operating licenses if audited or penalized, leading to disruptions in your supply chain.

  3. Legal Liability: Engaging with Driver Inc. companies could expose shippers to legal risks. If a contractor is found to be misclassified, government agencies might pursue back payments for taxes, EI, and CPP from all parties involved.

  4. Support for Ethical Practices: By avoiding Driver Inc. companies, shippers send a clear message that they support fair labor practices and industry integrity.

Shipper and Broker Due Diligence to Avoid Driver Inc.

To avoid the pitfalls of working with Driver Inc. companies, brokers and shippers must take proactive steps to ensure their carrier partners comply with legal and ethical standards. Here's how:

Verify Carrier Credentials

  • Safety and Compliance: Request proof of the carrier’s safety fitness certificate and verify compliance through provincial or federal registries.

    Insurance Verification: Ensure carriers provide valid liability and cargo insurance documents. Companies cutting corners often neglect proper coverage. Contact the insurance companies to verify.

  • Tax Compliance: Confirm the carrier’s CRA registration and ensure they remit CPP, EI, and income tax deductions for their employees.

  • Audit: Regularly review all documentation and ensure it is up to date

 Use Reputable Freight Matching Platforms

  • Partner with platforms that vet carriers for compliance with industry standards. This extra layer of screening reduces the risk of unknowingly working with a Driver Inc. company. (So not LoadLink).

Watch for Red Flags

  • Suspiciously Low Rates: Be wary of carriers offering rates significantly below market value. These often come at the expense of legal compliance.

  • High Turnover: Frequent driver turnover can indicate dissatisfaction stemming from poor working conditions or unethical practices.

  • Non-Standard Payment Terms: Be cautious of carriers that insist on unconventional payment terms or lack transparency in their financial dealings.

 Include Compliance Clauses in Contracts

  • Incorporate clauses that require carriers to confirm adherence to labor laws and regulations. Specify penalties or termination conditions for non-compliance, protecting your organization from potential liability.

Prioritize Long-Term Relationships

  • Foster partnerships with carriers committed to ethical practices and legal compliance. Establishing trust with reputable companies not only reduces risk but also enhances operational reliability.

Collaborate with Associations

  • Work with industry associations to stay informed about best practices and regulatory updates. Share information on any carriers that are using Driver Inc. practices.

Educate Your Team

  • Train your logistics team to understand the risks associated with Driver Inc. companies. Provide tools and resources to identify non-compliant carriers during the selection process.

By conducting thorough due diligence, brokers and shippers can minimize legal, financial, and reputational risks. Ensuring that carriers comply with labor laws supports a fairer, safer, and more sustainable trucking industry.

Final Thoughts

The Driver Inc. issue is a multifaceted challenge requiring action from all corners of the trucking industry. While the Canadian government lags in addressing this issue, it is left to industry associations and other industry stakeholders to address the problem as best they can with lobbying, education, and resources for shippers, brokers, and drivers. Shippers and brokers play a pivotal role in driving change. By avoiding Driver Inc. companies and advocating for ethical practices, you can protect your business while contributing to a more transparent and fair industry.

Previous
Previous

Gorgeous Girls In Supply Chain: Katherine Kruger

Next
Next

Gorgeous Girls In Supply Chain: Joanne Bricker